Why many government digital projects waste money and how to fix it
SEP. 18, 2025
5 Min Read
Public CIOs cut digital costs without cutting outcomes when they eliminate waste first and scale only what proves value.
Agencies face citizen expectations that rise faster than budgets, and the pressure is measurable as Capgemini found that citizens are 21% less satisfied with government services than private sector services, which keeps scrutiny high on every dollar spent.
key takeaways
- 1. Outcome only funding trims waste and keeps delivery moving because small releases prove value before scale.
- 2. Shared platforms and strict reuse policies reduce build and run costs while shortening time to value.
- 3. Automation pays back fastest when aimed at high volume steps and paired with a clear retirement plan.
- 4. Product based ownership with unit cost metrics turns budgets into portfolio choices that are easy to defend.
- 5. Tying vendor payments to verified outcomes aligns contracts with service improvements citizens actually feel.
Our point of view is simple and firm: cost reduction should never equal innovation reduction. Treat technology as a strategic investment, prioritize outcome-focused delivery, and fund what earns its keep. That stance shifts the conversation from project volume to measurable impact, aligning executives, finance, and program leaders around time to value and government digital ROI.
“Public CIOs cut digital costs without cutting outcomes when they eliminate waste first and scale only what proves value.”
Rising digital expectations collide with shrinking budgets
Citizen expectations have normalized around instant access, accurate status updates, and mobile-first experiences. The public sector has made strides, yet gaps persist that show why value must be proven early and often. One signal is channel readiness across Europe, where 96.1% of e-government services are now mobile-responsive, raising the bar for service design and operations everywhere.
Tight budgets do not excuse slow delivery. They call for precision on what gets built, what gets reused, and what gets retired. CIOs who insist on clear success metrics up front shift discussions with business leaders from feature wish lists to service outcomes. That reduces rework and trims scope before procurement starts, which is the most cost-effective time to eliminate waste.
Programs that focus on small, high-value releases win stakeholder support more quickly. Product teams can validate service steps with real users, prove throughput with release cadence, and build confidence with transparent metrics that tie back to mission goals. As those teams demonstrate that each increment lowers cost to serve and improves experience, funding becomes easier to defend. The story changes from spend to value.
Traditional approaches waste money without delivering results
Large, monolithic programs tend to hide risk and delay feedback. The result is overbuilt systems, duplicated functionality, and operating costs that lock budgets for years. The GAO has documented this pattern across federal agencies, noting that agencies typically report spending about 80% of their IT funds on the operations and maintenance of existing systems, which crowds out modernization.
Procurement process design adds friction when contracts reward outputs instead of outcomes. Multi-year scopes that front-load requirements and postpone user validation shift discovery to the most expensive phase of delivery. Waterfall funding creates the illusion of certainty while deferring learning to a late stage, where changes are slow and costly. Teams often meet contract milestones that do not translate to user value or lower operational costs.
A practical reset starts with reframing work from projects to products. That move sharpens accountability for the total cost of ownership and heightens attention to decommissioning, not just delivery. To make the shift tangible, use a simple comparison to guide portfolio choices.
| Approach | Typical cost pattern | Time to value |
|---|---|---|
| Project-based build | Heavy upfront spend and late rework | Late and lumpy |
| Product-based delivery | Staged spend matched to outcomes | Early and steady |
| Platform reuse first | Lower build and run through shared services | Quickest and repeatable |
Outcome-focused execution cuts waste and delivers ROI
Leaders want a playbook that reduces spend without slowing delivery. The most reliable path combines small bets with strict metrics, reuses proven components, and transfers ownership to teams accountable for delivering value. Funding follows evidence, not estimates. Good governance then rewards cost per outcome, not activity volume. A handful of practical moves consistently improve both cost and speed when applied with discipline.
- Prioritize value slices that reduce cost to serve for a specific service step.
- Reuse platforms and shared components before writing any custom code.
- Retire legacy components as the first production slice goes live.
- Automate high-frequency manual tasks with low-code workflows and RPA.
- Track unit costs per transaction and per release to direct funding.
- Shorten release cycles to two to four weeks to keep risk and rework low.
These moves avoid overbuilding while focusing the team on business impact. They also reveal where automation pays back first, which is essential when every dollar must count. Forrester’s Total Economic Impact research on enterprise workflow automation reported triple-digit ROI for a composite organization, including a 248% return for modern process automation at scale, illustrating how targeted automation can fund itself when scoped to clear outcomes. The result is less manual effort, fewer handoffs, and faster time to value.
“Funding follows evidence, not estimates.”
Four closing points help the change stick. First, connect every backlog item to a measurable cost or service improvement goal that is visible to finance and program owners. Second, require a decommissioning plan before a new build starts, so savings appear on schedule. Third, standardize release health metrics across teams so leaders can compare outcomes, not opinions. Fourth, tie contract payments to verified outcomes to align vendor incentives with agency goals.
Lean strategy turns IT from a cost center to a value driver
A lean strategy asserts that technology spend must earn its way at each step. That stance assigns product leaders the mandate to improve outcomes now and reduce total run cost over the next few quarters, not years. The philosophy is not ideological; it is practical budgeting for agencies that need proof before scale. PMI’s Pulse of the Profession quantified the risk of poor execution, finding wasted investment due to poor project performance near 9.4%, underscoring how governance must reward outcomes over activity.
Build the strategy on three commitments. First, invest in the data needed to measure cost per outcome across programs so leaders can compare options honestly and shift funds quickly. Second, adopt product-centric funding that renews only based on delivered value, not a declared percentage of completion. Third, rationalize overlapping apps and interfaces so teams stop paying for redundant capability and fragmented support. Those steps help a budget discussion turn into a portfolio conversation with visible and testable tradeoffs.
Execution closes the loop. Shorter release cycles create a steady record of improvements that finance leaders can audit. Clear retirement milestones convert promises into line-item savings. Shared platforms lower integration cost for new services and free talent to focus on innovation that citizens actually feel. That is how government digital transformation cost reduction becomes a routine practice rather than a one-time fix.
How Lumenalta helps public CIOs cut costs without slowing outcomes
Those questions point to a simple truth that cost control and speed reinforce each other when teams fund what works and retire what does not. Agencies that adopt short release cadences earn trust faster because stakeholders see steady results. IDC expects 60% of core infrastructure, security, data, and network offerings to require cloud-based control platforms that automate operations and reduce ongoing costs, which favors teams that design for automation from the start. A lean, product-centered model makes that shift practical because each improvement is small enough to measure, fund, and support without stressing procurement or operations.
That is the context where Lumenalta contributes with a single aim to help CIOs cut costs while raising performance. Our teams favor tight scopes, weekly progress, and shared platforms, which let leaders redirect funds from maintenance to innovation that citizens can feel. The emphasis on measurable unit costs, clear retirement milestones, and outcome-based governance keeps budgets honest and keeps delivery predictable. The result is a portfolio that earns its budget every quarter and a path to government digital ROI that starts paying back soon and compounds over time.
Table of contents
- Rising digital expectations collide with shrinking budgets
- Traditional approaches waste money without delivering results
- Outcome-focused execution cuts waste and delivers ROI
- Lean strategy turns IT from cost center to value driver
- How Lumenalta helps public CIOs cut costs without slowing outcomes
- Common questions
Common questions
How can governments cut digital transformation costs without slowing delivery?
What strategies reduce the cost of digital projects with the highest impact?
How do governments achieve ROI from digital investments that stakeholders trust?
What procurement practices support cost reduction and still meet compliance?
How should CIOs balance modernization with operational risk during cutover?
Want to learn how digital transformation can bring more transparency and trust to your operations?
