Two paths to data platform adoption
When building a large-scale data platform, organizations typically follow one of two paths:
"Implement Fast and Optimize Later": This approach prioritizes speed over efficiency, leading to rapid, often uncontrolled cost growth. The focus is on getting projects live, proving value, with little consideration for ongoing operational expenses.
- Pros: Short-term business value is delivered fast with limited investment.
- Cons: Long-term business value is not guaranteed, with refactoring likely required.
"Invest in Foundational FinOps": This strategic approach integrates FinOps, automation, optimizations, and system transparency from the outset. It prioritizes making smart, value-driven investment decisions from day one.
- Pros: Long-term business value can be identified and predicted at scale
- Cons: Initial POC can be slower
The difference between these two approaches can be illustrated by the following two graphics
A typical pattern associated with Implement Fast will often result in a spike in spend that does not deliver value. This spend is usually a surprise and requires manual intervention to fix the excess spend. In this scenario, cost and business value are disconnected but a test solution is built fast.
In contrast to the “Implement Fast”, the image above connects spend to business value and builds in automated cost optimization. This drives significantly more long term value but requires more foundational auto-optimization work up front.